Unveiling an Injustice: Man Imprisoned as Teen for Flower Shop Killing Released as Conviction Overturned. Marvin Haynes, 35, who spent most of his life in prison for a crime he denies, left the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Stillwater on Monday in a historic move. The release followed a judge’s judgment that eyewitness evidence, which supported his 2005 conviction for killing Randy Sherer in a Minneapolis flower shop, was untrustworthy.
Haynes, who was 16 when the incident occurred, thanked everyone who helped him through his difficult journey.
Unveiling an Injustice: Man Imprisoned as Teen for Flower Shop Killing Released as Conviction Overturned. Emerging into freedom, he declared, “And now y’all can recognize that I’m actually innocent.”
The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office, in a rare acknowledgment of a miscarriage of justice, sided with defense attorneys, conceding that the shaky eyewitness evidence violated Haynes’ constitutional rights during the trial. Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, after reviewing the case records, expressed that Haynes’ prosecution was a “terrible injustice,” as his conviction heavily relied on eyewitness identification without any forensic evidence or video linking him to the crime.
“We cannot undo the trauma experienced by those impacted by this prosecution. But today we have taken a step towards righting this wrong,” Moriarty stated, highlighting the gravity of the situation.
The pivotal moment in Haynes’ case came when Judge William Koch dismissed all charges with prejudice, emphasizing the unreliability of the eyewitness evidence. Koch noted that without this crucial aspect, there might not have been sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction. The judge underlined disparities between Haynes and the description provided by the primary eyewitness, including age, weight, height, and hairstyle
The flaws in the investigative process further unfolded during the court proceedings. The eyewitness initially identified someone who was in another state at the time of the killing. Subsequent lineups included outdated photos of Haynes, who had significantly altered his appearance, leading to the witness identifying him only in the third lineup and during trial testimony.
The Innocence Project, representing Haynes, pointed out the well-established risks of tainting identification when witnesses are subjected to multiple viewings of a suspect. Moriarty highlighted the broader issue, stating, “Like many Black boys at the time, our criminal legal system too easily wrote him off, failed to protect his rights and sent him to prison.”
Moriarty noted that retired Minneapolis Police Lt. Michael Keefe, one of the key investigators, objected to the lineup methods but was overruled. The case illuminates criminal justice structural concerns and marginalized groups’ struggles.
Haynes’ release highlights the fight for justice and the need for wrongful conviction reforms. The 2020 Minnesota Legislature lineup tightening to prevent witness misidentifications is a step toward a more equitable system.
As Haynes begins a new chapter, the case highlights the fragility of eyewitness testimony and the seriousness of false convictions. The path to justice is complicated, frequently including past atrocities, but Haynes’ release represents hope and resilience in a broken system.
Haynes’ release has reignited calls for criminal justice changes, including eyewitness identification issues. The Innocence Project, which exonerates falsely convicted people, said Haynes’ story is not unique. Eyewitness misidentifications cause 28% of erroneous convictions nationwide.
The case also highlights Black criminal justice system issues. Moriarty’s admission that the system too readily wrote off Haynes, exhibiting racial bias, emphasizes the necessity for substantial legal reforms to assure equal protection.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings
One Comment