Clarence Thomas Discloses 2019 Trips Funded by Friend and GOP Donor Harlan Crow. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has amended his 2023 financial disclosure forms to include previously unreported trips paid for by his friend, conservative businessman Harlan Crow. The trips, which took place in 2019, were to Bali and Sonoma County, California. Thomas had initially failed to disclose the trips, but has since acknowledged them and released amended financial disclosure forms.
Thomas has defended the trips, stating that they were paid for by close personal friends and did not constitute a conflict of interest. He has also stated that he has always followed Supreme Court guidance on financial disclosure and has sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines.
The issue of Thomas’ trips has sparked debate about the ethics of Supreme Court justices accepting gifts and travel from friends and acquaintances. Some have argued that such actions could create the appearance of impropriety and undermine the integrity of the court.
“During the preparation and filing of this report, filer sought and received guidance from his accountant and ethics counsel,” the filing states.
In response to the controversy, the Supreme Court has issued a new “Code of Conduct” that sets out guidelines for justices to follow when accepting travel and gifts. The code states that justices should not use judicial chambers, resources, or staff for personal activities and should not accept gifts or travel that could create the appearance of influencing their official duties.
The code also requires justices to disclose any gifts or travel accepted and to reimburse expenses reasonably incurred. The code applies to all Supreme Court justices and is intended to promote transparency and accountability in the court.
The controversy surrounding Thomas’ trips has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the Supreme Court. The new code of conduct is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to ensure that the court operates with the highest level of integrity and transparency.
Some have called for greater scrutiny of the court’s ethics rules and practices, including the disclosure of more detailed information about justices’ financial dealings and relationships. Others have argued that the court should establish an independent ethics committee to investigate and enforce ethics violations.
The issue of ethics in the Supreme Court is not new. In recent years, there have been several instances of justices facing ethical questions, including Justice Samuel Alito’s acceptance of expensive gifts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s use of court staff to promote her book.
The Supreme Court’s new code of conduct is a positive step towards addressing these concerns, but more needs to be done to ensure that the court operates with the highest level of integrity and transparency. By promoting transparency and accountability, the court can help to maintain public trust and ensure that justice is served.
In addition to the new code of conduct, the court should consider implementing other reforms, such as requiring justices to disclose more detailed information about their financial dealings and relationships, and establishing an independent ethics committee to investigate and enforce ethics violations.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings
One Comment