Supreme Court ruling gives Trump a ‘license to act like a thug’. Van Jones, a political commentator, expressed his concerns over the Supreme Court’s decision to give former President Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for actions he took while in office. Jones believes this decision gives Trump a “license to thug” and is a blow to the rule of law.
The Supreme Court’s decision was a significant victory for Trump in his federal case related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. The decision sends the case back to district court, where proceedings have been paused while the high court weighed Trump’s immunity claims.
Jones is concerned about the implications of this decision, particularly if Trump is reelected. He believes it sets a dangerous precedent and gives the president a free pass to engage in unlawful conduct without fear of consequences.
The Supreme Court’s decision was decided on ideological lines, with the conservative justices ruling in favor of Trump and the liberal justices dissenting. Jones believes this decision makes the Supreme Court look partisan and undermines its credibility as an impartial arbiter of the law.
“They’re supposed to be wearing these, kind of, black-and-white umpire jerseys, or whatever. They look like they’re wearing red jerseys, or even MAGA hats. It’s going to go down bad politically for the Supreme Court,” Jones said.
The case now returns to district court, where Judge Tanya Chutkan will weigh the issue for a second time, as well as other pending efforts by Trump seeking to toss the case. The decision is a significant setback for special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment of Trump, which alleged that Trump’s actions to remain in power after losing the election were not protected by presidential immunity.
Jones is not alone in his concerns about the Supreme Court’s decision. Many legal experts and political commentators have expressed similar worries about the implications of this decision. Some have argued that it sets a dangerous precedent and gives the president too much power to act with impunity.
The decision also highlights the ongoing polarization of the Supreme Court, which has become increasingly divided along ideological lines. The court’s decision in this case is a reflection of this polarization and has significant implications for the future of the presidency and the rule of law.
In conclusion, Van Jones’ comments highlight the concerns many have about the Supreme Court’s decision to give former President Trump immunity from criminal prosecution.
The decision has significant implications for the future of the presidency and the rule of law, and many believe it sets a dangerous precedent. As the case returns to district court, many will be watching closely to see how this plays out and what it means for the future of American democracy.
