Sage Steele Discusses ESPN’s Political Influence: “Those were officials”

Sage Steele Discusses ESPN’s Political Influence: “Those were officials”. Sage Steele’s revelations about the political dynamics at ESPN offer a fascinating glimpse into the intersection of sports and politics within the media landscape. Her insights shed light on the evolution of ESPN’s approach to political discourse and its impact on the overall atmosphere at the network.

Steele’s tenure at ESPN spanned over a decade, during which she witnessed significant changes in how politics was perceived and discussed within the organization. She noted that in the early years of her career at ESPN, sports served as a unifying force, providing a safe space for people to engage in discussions devoid of political tensions. However, this dynamic began to shift in the years leading up to the 2016 presidential election.

The pivotal moment came when Donald Trump secured victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. Steele recounted how she observed ESPN executives openly expressing their reactions to the election results on social media. This marked a departure from the previous apolitical stance of the network’s leadership and signaled a new era where political commentary became more prevalent, albeit predominantly from a left-leaning perspective.

Steele’s recollection of ESPN’s then-president, John Skipper, being permissive of political expression within the network highlights a significant turning point. While some may argue that freedom of expression is a fundamental right, Steele questioned the wisdom of allowing political commentary that alienated a portion of ESPN’s audience. She emphasized the importance of maintaining a neutral stance to appeal to a diverse range of viewers and advertisers, underscoring the business implications of overt political alignment.

“I remember being on Twitter and watching the posts from my bosses, executives making huge decisions for ESPN, tweeting about Donald Trump winning,” she said.

The appointment of James Pitaro as ESPN’s new president in 2018 marked a notable shift in the network’s approach to politics. Pitaro’s decision to dial back on political commentary and refocus on sports content was welcomed by Steele and others who shared her viewpoint. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent social unrest following the death of George Floyd reignited political discussions within the sports world, making it challenging to revert to a purely apolitical stance.

Steele’s departure from ESPN did not mark the end of her career in sports media. In fact, she embraced the opportunity to launch her podcast, “The Sage Steele Show,” on Bill Maher’s Club Random Studios platform. This move reflects her resilience and determination to continue engaging with audiences on topics she is passionate about, albeit in a format that allows for more autonomy and freedom of expression.

Beyond Steele’s personal journey, her story raises broader questions about the role of politics in sports media. As sports increasingly intersect with social and political issues, media outlets like ESPN face the challenge of striking a balance between providing comprehensive coverage and maintaining neutrality. While some argue that sports can be a platform for social activism and change, others contend that it should remain apolitical to preserve its role as a unifying force.

Ultimately, Steele’s insights underscore the complex interplay between sports, politics, and media in today’s society. Her experiences at ESPN serve as a microcosm of larger societal trends, highlighting the challenges and opportunities inherent in navigating the intersection of sports and politics in the modern media landscape. As the conversation continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how sports media outlets will adapt to meet the changing expectations and preferences of their audience.

READ MORE

• Sage Steele discusses his case against ESPN