Inside Scoop: Former Obama Aides Express Concerns Over Biden’s 2024 Election Strategy

Former Obama aides voice their worries over Biden 2024 election campaign strategies. Several individuals who previously served under Obama spoke to the press, sharing their insights into the differences they observed between the 2012 election under Obama’s leadership and the current approach of Biden’s campaign. Concerns are particularly directed at what is perceived as a less robust ground game compared to the well-organized efforts seen during Obama’s 2011 campaign.

One anonymous Democrat characterized the current campaign atmosphere by stating, “The vibe was that the campaign didn’t have its sh** together.”

They highlighted a lack of infrastructure at the state level and a comparatively understated campaign headquarters. In essence, there seems to be a consensus among some former Obama aides that Biden’s campaign, at this stage, appears less energetic and organized than Obama’s was during a similar timeframe.

A state director from the 2012 election echoed these sentiments, emphasizing a significant issue with Biden’s lack of organizational experience. They pointed out that Biden did not have a robust organization during the Democratic primary, and the general election coincided with the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, limiting on-the-ground activities. This observation underscores the unique hurdles faced by Biden in building a campaign apparatus amid the pandemic.

Suggestions have been put forth by some former aides that Biden should consider integrating White House advisers into his campaign team to bolster organizational efficiency.

David Axelrod, one of Obama’s key strategists, highlighted the wealth of experience within the White House that could contribute to a more effective campaign. Axelrod stated, “There is a treasure trove of experience in that White House. Probably some of it should be sitting over at the campaign.”

However, not everyone shares these concerns. Jim Messina, who managed Obama’s re-election campaign, provided a different perspective, expressing confidence in Biden’s approach.

He argued that the average swing voter pays limited attention to politics until the months leading up to November. Messina believes that the current strategy, focusing on activating the base and delivering messages closer to the election, is a smart one.

Biden’s team responded to the concerns raised by emphasizing the need for collective action against perceived threats from Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans. Kevin Munoz, a spokesperson for Biden, urged those concerned to channel their energy into organizing, donating, and discussing the stakes of the election.

Munoz stated, “We invite everyone concerned about the existential threat that Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans pose to our freedom and democracy to channel their energy toward organizing, donating, and talking to their friends about the stakes of this election and President Biden’s commitment to fighting these threats head-on.”

These concerns among former Obama aides align with a recent report from the Washington Post, suggesting that even Obama himself has raised questions about the structure of Biden’s re-election campaign.

According to the report, Obama has engaged in discussions with Biden directly, emphasizing the necessity for the campaign to have the autonomy to make decisions without constant clearance from the White House.

As the political landscape evolves and the prospect of the 2024 election looms, internal discussions within the Democratic camp are becoming more prominent. The concerns raised by former Obama aides shed light on a desire for a robust and well-organized strategy, drawing parallels to the successful campaign tactics employed during Obama’s tenure.

The ability of the Biden campaign to address these concerns and adapt its approach will likely play a pivotal role in shaping the narrative leading up to the 2024 election.

READ ALSO

• The government was unaware that Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was hospitalized