Manhattan DA Threatens 30-Day Jail Sentence for Trump Upon Gag Order Breach. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has filed a motion with the court, requesting that former President Donald Trump be held in criminal contempt for violating the court’s order restricting his extrajudicial statements. Bragg argues that Trump has already violated the order on three separate occasions, each of which would carry a fine of $1,000.
According to the filing, Trump’s comments on social media regarding former porn star Stormy Daniels and his own former attorney Michael Cohen constitute attacks on “known witnesses” and violate the court’s April 1 order. Bragg alleges that Trump’s actions are “deliberate and intended to intimidate this Court and impede the orderly administration of this trial.”
“It is absolutely critical that defendant immediately halt any conduct that would violate the April 1 order’s narrow restrictions to protect the integrity of the ongoing trial,” Bragg’s filing continued.
Bragg’s motion emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal process and ensuring that Trump does not undermine the court’s authority.
This development comes after the first day of Trump’s trial, during which 50 potential jurors were dismissed. Trump complained to reporters about Judge Merchan, who refused to allow him to miss court for a Supreme Court hearing on presidential immunity and suggested he could prevent Trump from attending his son Barron’s graduation in mid-May.
The motion highlights the escalating tensions between Trump and the court, and raises concerns about the potential for further disruptions to the trial. Trump’s history of using social media to attack his adversaries and discredit legal proceedings has raised concerns about his willingness to respect the legal process.
Bragg’s filing notes that Trump’s comments on social media have already caused harm, citing the dismissal of 50 potential jurors on the first day of the trial. The filing argues that Trump’s actions have created a “toxic atmosphere” that undermines the fairness and integrity of the trial.
The motion also highlights the need for the court to take action to protect the integrity of the legal process. Bragg argues that Trump’s violations of the court’s order are not only a violation of the law but also an attack on the court’s authority. The filing requests that the court take immediate action to hold Trump in criminal contempt and impose sanctions to prevent further violations.
As the legal proceedings continue, it remains to be seen how the court will respond to Bragg’s filing and address Trump’s alleged violations of the court’s order. The outcome of this motion will have significant implications for the integrity of the legal process and the ability of the court to maintain order and fairness in the trial.
The case against Trump is a high-profile one, with significant political and legal implications. The former president faces charges related to his alleged involvement in a hush-money scheme to silence Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen. The trial is expected to be a lengthy and complex one, with many legal and political observers watching closely.
In the midst of this high-stakes legal battle, Bragg’s motion serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal process. The court’s response to this motion will have significant implications for the fairness and integrity of the trial, and will be closely watched by legal and political observers.
