Bragg Does Not Object to Delaying Trump’s Sentence. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office has announced that they will not oppose former President Donald Trump’s request to challenge his guilty verdict in the hush-money trial and postpone sentencing. This development comes after Trump’s legal team argued that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on immunity for official acts as president affirmed their position that the guilty verdict should be set aside.
The case revolves around Trump’s alleged involvement in a “catch-and-kill” scheme to influence the 2016 election by falsifying business records to cover up a tryst with adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Trump has consistently denied the affair and pleaded not guilty to the charges. In May, a jury convicted Trump on 34 felony counts, leading to his vow to appeal the verdict.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday, which sent a federal election case brought by special counsel Jack Smith back to a lower court for further review, has implications for Trump’s case. His legal team argues that the ruling supports their position that the guilty verdict should be overturned.
The DA’s office has requested a July 24 deadline to file and serve a response, expecting Trump’s legal team to file a motion to set aside the verdict by July 10. Judge Juan Merchan has set sentencing for July 11.
“Although we believe defendant’s arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion,” they said.
This case is one of four criminal cases looming over Trump as he seeks a second term in the White House. In addition to the hush-money case, Trump faces two cases led by special counsel Smith: a 2020 election case and one focusing on classified documents. Another 2020 election case, led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, is ongoing in Georgia.
While Trump maintains his innocence in all cases, the legal battles pose significant challenges for his presidential campaign. The outcome of these cases may impact the trajectory of his political future and the fate of his potential second term.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the public awaits the outcome of these high-stakes cases, which have significant implications for Trump’s political future and the country’s political landscape.
In related news, Trump’s legal team has filed a motion to disqualify Judge Merchan from the case, citing bias and prejudice. The motion alleges that Judge Merchan made inappropriate comments during the trial, demonstrating a lack of impartiality.
The DA’s office has responded, arguing that the motion lacks merit and that Judge Merchan has acted fairly throughout the proceedings. The judge has not yet ruled on the motion.
The ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump have sparked intense debate and scrutiny, with many calling for accountability and transparency. As the cases progress, the nation watches with bated breath, eager for resolution and clarity on the fate of the former president.
