Police Say No Records Found That Mob Of Racist Whites Surrounded Fani Willis’ Home. Testifying in February, Floyd recounted a disturbing incident that reportedly led to Willis’ relocation. He described a harrowing scene outside her home, where individuals gathered in the early hours of the morning, hurling racial slurs and threats at his daughter. The situation escalated to the point where police intervention was required, with neighbors calling law enforcement to disperse the crowd.
“After she was sworn in on January 1, 2021, on or about the third of February at probably 5, 5:30 a.m. in the morning,” Floyd explained, “there were people outside her house cursing and yelling and calling her the b-word and n-word. It was bizarre. Fortunately, the neighbors called the police and disbanded the group.”
Floyd’s testimony painted a picture of fear and intimidation, with threats of violence directed not only at Willis but also at himself and his grandchildren. He detailed instances of prolonged surveillance, with individuals stationed outside their residence for hours on end, heightening concerns for their safety.
The gravity of the situation prompted heightened security measures, including regular police patrols and inspections for potential explosives.
However, a subsequent investigation into these alleged incidents yielded surprising results. Despite Floyd’s detailed testimony, a public records request by The Daily Wire revealed a striking absence of documentation supporting the claims. In fact, the City of South Fulton Police Department, tasked with overseeing the area where Willis resided, stated that it had no record of any such disturbances.
The sole incident report on file pertained to an unrelated matter—an abandoned vehicle—casting doubt on the veracity of Floyd’s account.
The lack of corroborating evidence raised significant questions about the credibility of Floyd’s testimony and the events described therein. While Willis’ camp remained silent on the matter, the absence of police records cast doubt on the narrative presented in court. The discrepancy between Floyd’s vivid recollection and the official records underscored the need for thorough investigation and scrutiny in legal proceedings.
Moreover, the circumstances surrounding Willis’ claims bear striking similarities to past incidents of alleged victimization that later proved to be fabricated.
The comparison to Jussie Smollett’s infamous case, where the actor falsely claimed to be a victim of a hate crime, highlights the importance of corroborating evidence and due diligence in evaluating such allegations.
The courtroom proceedings further unfolded with revelations of credibility issues surrounding Willis and her boyfriend, Nathan Wade. Despite denying any impropriety, evidence emerged of extensive communication between Willis and Wade, raising questions about their professional conduct. Additionally, questionable expenditures on work-related trips, allegedly funded by Wade’s work credit card, added to the scrutiny surrounding their relationship.
In response to the mounting controversy, Judge Scott McAfee ordered the removal of either Willis or Wade from the case, citing concerns about prosecutorial integrity. The matter now rests with the appeals court, tasked with reviewing McAfee’s decision and determining the future course of the proceedings.
As the legal battle rages on, the implications of these developments extend beyond the confines of the courtroom. Willis’ request for expanded powers to designate more staff as personal employees, citing purported threats against her, underscores the broader societal implications of the case. Moreover, the recent arrest of an Alabama man for leaving threatening voicemails about Willis serves as a stark reminder of the intense scrutiny and polarizing nature of the proceedings.
