Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s recent comments about the moon at an eclipse-viewing event have sparked discussions about the importance of accurate scientific knowledge, particularly when addressing impressionable audiences. Jackson Lee’s statements, although well-intentioned, reveal some misunderstandings about celestial bodies and space exploration.
During her address to a crowd of teenage students outside Booker T. Washington High School in Houston, Texas, Jackson Lee made several scientifically dubious claims about the moon. She began by describing the moon as “made up mostly of gases,” which is inaccurate.
“You’ve heard the word ‘full moon.’ Sometimes you need to take the opportunity just to come out and see a full moon is that complete rounded circle, which is made up mostly of gases,” Jackson Lee began.
Furthermore, Jackson Lee suggested that humans could potentially live on the moon due to its composition of gases. This statement overlooks the harsh realities of living in space, including the lack of atmosphere, extreme temperatures, and radiation exposure. While scientists are exploring the possibility of establishing lunar habitats or bases for short-term stays, the idea of permanent human settlement on the moon remains a distant prospect.
Jackson Lee also claimed that the sun is “almost impossible to go near,” while the moon is “more manageable.” While it’s true that the sun’s surface temperature is incredibly high, it’s not accurate to suggest that the moon is more manageable for human exploration. In fact, the moon’s lack of atmosphere provides no protection from harmful solar radiation, making prolonged exposure hazardous to human health.
Additionally, Jackson Lee’s comments about the moon’s “unique light and energy” are vague and unsupported by scientific evidence. While the moon does reflect sunlight, its appearance and brightness vary depending on its phase and position relative to Earth and the sun. Describing the moon’s light and energy as “unique” without further clarification leaves room for misunderstanding among listeners.
One of the most concerning aspects of Jackson Lee’s remarks is her statement regarding the solar eclipse. Instead of explaining the astronomical phenomenon in scientific terms, she suggested that the eclipse was caused by the moon being “close to the Earth,” without mentioning the alignment of the sun, moon, and Earth. This oversight not only perpetuates misconceptions but also undermines the educational value of such events for young audiences.
Furthermore, Jackson Lee’s claim that humans have not been on the moon in the last 50 years is inaccurate. The last manned mission to the moon was Apollo 17 in December 1972. While there have been no crewed missions to the moon since then, NASA and other space agencies have continued to study and explore the lunar surface through robotic missions and satellite observations.
It’s worth noting that Jackson Lee’s previous role as the top Democrat on the House Science Committee’s space subcommittee adds another layer of concern. As a lawmaker with oversight responsibilities in the field of space exploration, she should be expected to have a solid understanding of scientific concepts and developments. However, her past inquiry about the Mars Pathfinder’s ability to capture photos of the American flag planted by Neil Armstrong further highlights the importance of accurate scientific literacy among policymakers.
In conclusion, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s comments about the moon reflect a misunderstanding of basic scientific principles and demonstrate the need for accurate science communication, especially among public figures. While her enthusiasm for space exploration is commendable, it’s essential for leaders to convey accurate information to inspire and educate the next generation of scientists and explorers.
